Skip to main content

College Green Plaza – It will kill us!!!

College Green Plaza – It will kill us!!!

As human beings, we love stability and routine and we hate change. In its effort to protect us, our brain is interpreting change and uncertainty as danger and does everything possible to bring is back to the routine again. That is one of the reasons why changing your life or aspects of your life is so challenging.

But as we should know, there is nothing more reliable than that change will occur. So it often makes more sense to focus on how change can benefit us than to focus on resisting change.

The opponents of the College Green Plaza, however, are resisting as much as possible and at times in hilarious or ridiculous ways.

The An Bord Pleanala hearings are taking place at the moment. An Bord Pleanala is the Irish planning authority and they have to agree to Dublin City’s plans for turning the College Green Plaza into a pedestrianised area and to ban all sorts of traffic and before they make a decision, they have to give all interested parties an opportunity to express their concerns.

I remember when many years ago it was suggested to introduce a “Lotto” game in Ireland. People were OUTRAGED and saw civilisation to come to a certain end if that Lotto thing ever was allowed. The prediction was that all the unemployed and the pensioners would spend EVERY single penny on Lotto tickets and widespread poverty would be an absolute certainty. It was – as we know now total and utter nonsense. And since then the National Lottery, has introduced more and more and more different types of lottery games and society still functions.

BUT, it will all change when the College Green Plaza is pedestrianised. Because that will now finally end civilisation as we know it….at least if you listen to the opponents.

Before I give you some examples of the hilarious and ridiculous arguments the NO side is bringing up, allow me to tell you that I am not the biggest fan of the College Green Plaza plans. I have a car and use it often for work but also for transporting goods and people to events and to hobby locations and Dublin has a “problem” that you will encounter whenever you drive from South Side to the North Side and vice versa. That “problem” is that darn river that limits the crossing points and causes plenty of traffic bottle necks. Sure, all this is not helped by Dublin City’s traffic rules which are in part intended to manage the limited space for traffic and in other parts there to make it as difficult as possible to experience a smooth ride in Dublin traffic so that we all hopefully leave the car at home.

My preferred North-South route was through O’Connell Street, across O’Connell Bridge and then towards College Green, passing by Grafton Street and then onwards to Merrion Square. But a few years ago we were not allowed to drive down O’Connell Street anymore. then the euphemistically named “Bus Gate”, which is was more correctly a timed street closure for cars at College Green was introduced and with the LUAS from Stephen’s Green to O’Connell Street, College Green became completely impassable for cars. So bit by bit by bit we had to get used to new routes and get used to the fact that College Green will just not be available anymore at all.

It was different for busses and taxis. They still used the College Green route, but now face a closure, which they resist for numerous reasons. The Dublin traders also don’t want change as they are worried, that change will push people out of the City Centre to do their shopping in the Blanchardstowns and Liffey Valleys etc. Understandable in parts, but imagine, Grafton Street was once a street that was used by bi-directional car traffic and despite the pedestrianisation of Grafton Street people still come to the city centre.

So what are these crazy concerns that town planners and city traders have?

Town Planner Tom Phillips who represents the retailers thinks that people will go to Dundrum etc if the key traffic artery is cut off. He has a point, but he seemingly didn’t realise that that key artery has already been essentially cut years ago and that the LUAS put the nail in the coffin. The pedestrianisation is not changing anything anymore and it is somewhat unlikely that the LUAS will be banned from College Green. He also would have most like used the same argument against the pedestrianisation of Grafton Street!! He also claims that a College Green Plaza will bring a risk of terrorism!! Where that is suddenly coming from he doesn’t explain and it sounds like total nonsense.

Representatives of car park owners in the city centre want compensation for people not parking there anymore. Dohh!!! That is the whole idea. Dublin City wants to keep cars out of the city. I suggest the car park owners knock down the car parks if nobody is using them anymore and turn them into apartments. That helps with another crisis and will probably make them a lot more money,

The Taxi drivers tried to use the “disabled people” card. They claimed that the proposed changes would affect vulnerable people who needed taxis. I think they have a point, BUT should that now give them also permission to drive up and down Grafton Street? And if not, why is that argument valid for College Green, but not for Grafton Street and Henry Street etc?

People with disabilities were concerned that proposed two way cycle tracks would cause a danger for people with disabilities and older people. Actually, cyclists in Dublin (the ones that ignore traffic lights) are a danger to everyone, not only people with disabilities and age. But I still think that that danger is slightly lower than the danger that cars do or can cause. I can’t comment on their other concern about the lack of a street kerb, something that seemingly causes a problem for guide dogs.

The Wednesday hearing is described in the Irish Times here.

But it continued! On Thursday then Parliament Street became an issue. Dublin Bus wants to be able to use Parliament Street (from Liffey to City Hall) in both directions to make up for the unavailability of College Green and it was said that 1600 busses would move through the streets per day. And now the locals there had an issue. A Dr Imelda Shanahan said that the fact that 1600 busses would need to go through Parliament Street would lead to breaches in air quality standards that will continue long into the future. Wait! The use of Parliament Street will do that? We have to assume that the same number of busses are currently going through College Green, so NOTHING will change to air quality good or bad, the same situation will just be relocated. So if there are breaches there now, these breaches will still be there….just in a different street!?

Consulting architect Des McMahon correctly described that the street would be more a bus corridor than an inner city street. So Parliament Street would just become what College Green is now. Not great, but not the biggest deal either in a city wide picture. (I understand that locals feel differently.)

The Irish Times report about the Thursday hearing is here.

In my opinion, the traffic situation caused by the LUAS is really bad, but I was in front of Trinity College last week and unless Taxis and Busses will be completely banned from there, chaos will rule in that part of the city. There are just sooo many busses going through and that flippin LUAS doesn’t help things.

Since we had to put up with the street closure at College Green for a while I started to imagine how that new plaza could be used and I found lots of great uses for it. For markets and events etc. It would create what Dublin is lacking sorely: a City Centre plaza for central events. Smithfield totally failed and you can see why and there is NO other plaza available for weekly markets, for busking and open air music. There is a serious problem though: Dublin City will probably do their best to restrict the use of this plaza sooo much that it will be empty most of the time. So I think Dublin City should stop trying to bully us into accepting the plaza and should start trying to convince us that it is a great enhancement for city life. Tell us what you plan to have there. We don’t need an empty, car free place. But we do need an central inner city event space.

Traders will be still worried, because they HATE inner city markets. They don’t see that the vibrancy and the fact that it attracts lots more people to go there will automatically have a positive effect on inner city trade. Instead they are ALWAYS worried stiff that a food stall or a product stall on a market will take business AWAY from them. Short sightedness still rules!

Phoenix Park is NOT the biggest City Park in Europe

Phoenix Park is NOT the biggest City Park in Europe

Have you ever heard someone saying that Phoenix Park is the biggest city park in Europe? I heard that a long time ago and for many years, I said it to every visitor who came to see me in Ireland. But one day I looked into it and found out that this is actually not true!

Phoenix Park has 707 hectares (1,750 acres) and the largest city Park in Europe is the Lee Valley Park in London with 4,046 hectares.
Then I read that it was the largest city park in a capital of Europe. But Lee Valley Park is in a capital and even if you don’t count that one, then Richmond Park in London with 955 hectares is still bigger.
I kept searching and found that Phoenix Park is allegedly the largest ENCLOSED park in Europe. But that is not true either, because Château de Chambord in the Loire Valley in France has 5,440 hectares and is therefore much larger than our little Phoenix Park.

So, what is the “trick”? …here it comes:
Phoenix Park is the largest ENCLOSED PUBLIC park in a CAPITAL city in Europe.

Isn’t this as if you said Dublin Airport is the biggest airport in the world … out of all the airports that are in a city that starts with D, uses Euro for currency and has a Spire.

Trickery!!

Clontarf Seawater Baths to open

Clontarf Seawater Baths to open

I was surprised reading that because a “Seawater Bath” is not the thing that I would have expected to open for business in cold February. Well and then there also is the big question if a sea water swimming pool makes sense at any time in Ireland. But David Cullen (Publican, Hotelier and owner of Seafield Hotel and Spa in Co. Wexford and of Turk’s Head in Dublin) is clearly of a different opinion.

He is leasing the baths for EUR 25k per year from Dublin City and has invested a whopping amount of 2.4mio in renovating the baths. And if you still question his sanity, I can tell you that he is not relying on the attractiveness and weather-compatibility of the baths alone, but a possibly bigger attraction and revenue generator is the fact that he has a pub license for the building that is next to he baths and where he will run a bar and restaurant. So even if nobody will ever enter the water, he will have a business.

Find out some more information, including a picture in this RTE News article.

Are Irish judges idiots??

Are Irish judges idiots??

It seems that there is no end to astonishing decisions by judges in Ireland. This could be a case where drunk driving gets a little slap on the wrist or where the theft of social welfare money will be “rewarded” with the thief getting away with no punishment at all.

Last week another amazing story made it from the courts into the newspapers. The court decision that is absolutely unbelievable is already from 2013/2016 and the reason why it is appearing now again is because thankfully the losing party has appealed the decision to the High Court and I can only hope that the 2016 decision will be overturned.

According to an article in the Irish Independent, this is what happened:

A guy entered a pub in Rathmines one evening in April 2013. He ordered a pint and put EUR 10 on the counter. The barman picks up the EUR 10 note and says that this note is fake and possibly 10 other people in the pub heard that. The customer claimed that he got the note from the post office and therefore the note was not fake. Then the customer claims that he went to the Rathmines Garda Station, the note was tested and he was told that it is perfect. He then returned to the bar and told the barman what the garda said. The next day the customer went to his solicitor and sued the pub for defamation.

Sounds like a simple story, but I am still waiting for where the customer was defamed. The Circuit Court was totally on the customer’s side and awarded EUR 5,000 to the customer.

This is a super odd case, so keep reading, it gets a lot more interesting.

But let’s look at the definition of defamation first. A defamatory statement is one which tends to injure a person’s reputation in the eyes of reasonable members of society. So if the pub had been empty, the customer would not have been awarded a cent. But because there were some people in the pub that MIGHT have heard that the barman stated that this was fake money, it could be defamation. But it is ONLY defamation if the statement “injures a person’s reputation”. With the huge amounts of fake money going around, I think a lot more people than we know have handled fake notes. And if we assume that you might get a fake note as change and because most of us do not check every note we get, I think it is not certain that a person’s reputation is automatically damaged if somebody thinks that the money you have is fake.

We can all FEEL to be defamed, but that doesn’t mean our reputation actually did suffer!

But it continues!! Oddly, it turns out, that the customer did NOT go to the Garda Station in Rathmines and NO Garda confirmed that the money was “perfect”. The two gardai on duty that night said that nobody came with a potentially fake note and that they also don’t have a machine to check money. Wow! So did the the customer tell a big fat lie?

Could that also mean that he did not get this note from the post office? Not that getting a note from a post office is a guarantee that it is not fake, but possibly the money was NOT from a source that is perceived to be reputable. Allegedly he told the barman that he got it from a “bookies or a shop” but in court the customer claimed that he said he got it from the Post Office.

Looks to me that the customer’s statements might not be the most reliable? How can the Circuit Court in a situation like force the pub to give him EUR 5,000?

Was that Circuit Court judge asleep? Odd!!

“New” Luas causing problems!

“New” Luas causing problems!

It is a good and a bad sign that the Public Transport system in Dublin is reaching max. capacity. Darts are packed, Busses are full and Luas trams need to be extended to deal with the amount of customers that want to use the systems. This is what the creators of Public Transport want. This is what they created all car traffic limitations for! But when it happens, then there is panic because nobody seems to have a “Next Step” plan in place. Dart platforms have been extended to the maximum. Busses are passing by bus stops without stopping and there is currently no plan to buy/use/deploy more busses on the busy routes and for the Luas the only way to deal with it is to extend the trams so much that now they don’t fit into our streets anymore. :-O

TheJournal.ie reports that the new 55m long Luas is too long for O’Connell Bridge and therefore blocks traffic when its back is sticking out. But the longer trams are needed to accommodate all customers.

What will we do when all three systems are overcrowded?

 
Malcare WordPress Security